Implications: rapid population aging. 1-child policy means that cost of pensions, health care, and social services will thus rise.
- 1 in 6 now above 60
- 1 in 4 above 2030
- 1 in 3 by 2050
“get old before getting rich”
demography
1980-2010
- low dependency ratios
- high household savings rate
- large lavor supply
- “age of abundance”
decline
- rapidly aging population
- rapidly rising dependency ratios
- ageing population / rising health / retirement costs
- shrikning labor force, rising wages
- declining of deposits in bank system
- less capital
resulting dynamics
- labor force shrinking by 2 million workers per year
- manufacturing wages rising faster
- labor cost advantage almost gone
wages keep going up
health
- improved health => living longer
- china’s life expectancy is around 80ish yo
people are living longer…
Savings Rate
People have decreasing savings rate; so when people can’t feed their parent, government can’t really step in correctly because the social safety net is not completely setup.
- projections of consumption vs savings level increased aging
- household surplus devoted to savings will disappear by 2035
China’s preparation
- growth model focused on investment in physical infrastructure, and insufficient in education / health
- consumption unusually low as contirbutor to GDP
- limited investment in social programs and social expenditures (e.g., education, health, retirement)
implications
- households cannot transfer income from young to old
- government must take up slack, but they don’t have ability; pressure for change in growth model
- pressure to change tax system to raise ventures
- constrained spending on geopolitical ambitions
education
Well-educated population is essential for economic development.
- STEM field innovation (economics and finance)
- literacy and numeracy is essential for shift from low-wage to high-wage
- to move into innovative, productivity driven growth that moves economies form middle income to high income
Korea Taiwan Israel Ireland Spain Singapore moved up across middle income trap; but other fall. China does very well in Elite education, but poorly for broader population.
Education quality
- Chinese students scores very very well
- metrics are only BSJZ (i.e. no rural provinces)
