event
Last edited: August 8, 2025An event is sub-subset of the sample space \(E \in S\). These are some subset to which you ascribe some meaning.
Example: Cloth Fitting Prediction
Last edited: August 8, 2025Have: \(m\) training data points \((\theta_{i}, \phi_{i})\) generated from the true/approximated function \(\phi_{i} = f\qty (\theta_{i})\) (which uses physical simulation/CV techniques). Training data here is *very expensive and lots of errors
Want: \(\hat{f}\qty(\theta) = f\qty(\theta)\)
Problem: as joints rotate (which is highly nonlinear), cloth verticies move in complex and non-linear ways which are difficult to handle with a standard neural network—there are highly non-linear rotations! which is not really easy to make with standard model functions using \(\hat{f}\).
Exercises in PGA
Last edited: August 8, 2025Preamble
As notation differs between Alg4DM (which the presentation and notes use) and the paper, we provide a note here to standardize the notation of the PGA formulation to avoid confusion.
Recall that the non-linear program formulation of the naive PGA implementation gives:
\begin{align} \max_{\theta}\ &f(\theta) \\ \text{such that}\ &J\theta = \bold{1} \\ & \theta \geq \bold{0} \\ & h_{i}(\theta) \leq \epsilon_{i},\ \forall i \end{align}
for:
\begin{equation} f(\theta) = \beta^{\top} \bold{Z}^{-1} \bold{r}_{\theta} \end{equation}
existence of eigenvalue of operators
Last edited: August 8, 2025A result so important it gets a page.
Every operator on a finite-dimensional, non-zero, complex vector space has an eigenvalue.
Proof:
Suppose \(V\) is a complex vector space with dimension \(n > 0\), and \(T \in \mathcal{L}(V)\). Choose \(v \in V, v\neq 0\) (possible as \(V\) is non-zero):
Construct a list of \(n+1\) vectors:
\begin{equation} v, Tv, \dots T^{n} v \end{equation}
because we managed to cram \(n+1\) vectors into a list for a vector space with dimension \(n\), that list is linearly dependent.
expectation
Last edited: August 8, 2025expectation is the calculation of the “intended” or “target” value given a random variable:
\begin{equation} \mathbb{E}[M] = \sum_{x} x\ p(X=x) \end{equation}
- Standardize variables to \(z\) by dividing
- The correlation is simply their “product”: means of positive and negative groups
The expectation is the average of the counts of the data you have.
properties of expectation
these holds REGARDLESS of whether or not the variables you are doing is independent, IID, etc.
Linearity in the first slot
expectation has additivity and homogeneity.