Myhill-Nerode Theorem
Last edited: August 8, 2025entire characterization of regular languages: provide necessary and sufficient conditions for regular languages
Statement: a language \(L\) is regular IFF the number of equivalence classes of \(\equiv_{L}\) is finite
corollary
\(L\) is not regular IFF there are infinitely many equivalance classes of \(\equiv_{L}\), meaning there are infinitely many strings $w_1, w_2, …$ such that \(w_{i} \neq w_{j}\) and those strings are also distinguishable to \(L\) meaning, there is at least one \(z \in \Sigma^{*}\) such that exactly one of \(w_{i}z\) and \(w_{j}z\) is in \(L\).
N-Grams
Last edited: August 8, 2025Main goals: assign a probability of each sequence of words existing:
\begin{equation} P(W) = P(w_1, \dots, w_{n}) \end{equation}
closely related is the NLG formulation of predicting an upcoming word:
\begin{equation} P(w_5|w_1, \dots, w_{n}) \end{equation}
either of these we call a “grammar”, or “Language Model”.
Chain Rule Language Modeling
Recall probability chain rule. Now, the probability of a sequence like:
\begin{equation} P(its\ water\ is\ so\ transparent) \end{equation}
gives:
\begin{equation} P(its) \times P(water|its) \times P(is | its\ water) \dots \end{equation}
NACC
Last edited: August 8, 2025NACC is a large, longitudinal dataset for neurodegentitive disease as a project in collaboration with Dr. Alyssa Weakley at UC Davis.
Dr. Alyssa Weakley is interested in
- Early Cognitive Change
- Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
“How early can we detect, using NACC, change?”
dataset construction
- Participants are given a battery of mental capacity tests, these values are tracked over time
- There are also family member questionnaire
- Neuroimaging and biomarker data
Other things tracked in the data—
National Banking Act
Last edited: August 8, 2025The National Banking Act unified Financial Markets.
natural number
Last edited: August 8, 2025natural numbers (\(\mathbb{N}\)) are the counting numbers: 1,2,3,4….
Zero is not part of it; this produces interesting results like set of natural number under addition is not a group because there is no identity (tbh nor inverse (inverse of 1 is -1 which is not in the set.))
