Let \(L\) be a regular language; then there is a positive integer \(P\) such that, for all strings \(w \in L\) with \(|w| \geq P\) there is a way to write \(w = x y z\), where…

• \(|y| > 0\) — so \(y \neq \varepsilon\)
• \(|x y | \leq P\)
• for all \(i \geq 0, xy^{i}z \in L\) (where \(y^{i}\) is \(y\) repeated \(i\) times); note that this also means that we can also reduce \(y\) in size to \(y \in \varepsilon\), and it will still hold.

Proof:

1. titles should have proper noun

2. cultural context, summary of the text, thesis—highlight Kairos (American context)

3. conclusion: what’s significant of this rhetoric?

4. access credibility

5. peer review

6. publication (editor and publisher should be named), is there a special interest group?

7. author’s training and publicatino record

8. quality of argument (reasoning + evidence, quality of works cited)

9. can you find some of the info else where in reputable sources?

cite one additional source

For instance, talk about Karios specifically

General Information

Claim Synthesis

Quotes Bin

Double entendre which frames the study of AI safety as “intellectual” (in contrast to War)

“And then there are these additional intellectual questions. Can AI, without robust common sense, be truly safe for humanity?”

double intentre: “intellectual” as in interesting but also “intellectual” as in worth asking

Language of Extremes: AI safety is a “bruce force” problem which requires “extreme scale”

And is brute-force scale really the only way and even the correct way to teach AI? So I’m often asked these days whether it’s even feasible to do any meaningful research without extreme-scale compute.

Quotes Bin

polarization distorts beliefs about others

“Recent years have seen a sharp increase in political polarization in the United States (1–7), leading to deadlock in Congress (8), distorted beliefs about fellow Americans (9, 10), and distrust, hostility, and even violence toward outgroup members (11–13)” [Novoa et al., 2023, p. 1]

generics about particular group is a way that polarized languages manifest

“Specifically, we focus on expressions that make claims about a category as a whole (e.g., “Democrats want to defund the police” makes a claim about the category of “Democrats”), also known as generics (34–38).” [Novoa et al., 2023, p. 2]